Daniels v Campbell NO and Others, an important case in South African law, was heard in the Constitutional Court on 6 November 2003, with judgment handed down on 11 March 2004. The applicant was a woman married in terms of Muslim rites, whose husband had died intestate. The court noted that Muslim marriages were not recognised in South African law. It concluded that this violated section 9 of the Constitution. Accordingly, it was held that the applicant could inherit. Th… WebCampbell and Others. Daniels v. Campbell and Others. The applicant was a woman married according to Muslim rites and whose husband had died intestate. The marriage …

William Marsh Will Trust - EX PARTE PRESIDENT OF THE ... - Studocu

WebJan 28, 2024 · DANIELS AND OTHERS V. DANIELS AND OTHERS . CHANCERY DIVISION 20, 21 JULY 1977 1978 2 All E.R. 89 3PLR/1977/23 (CA) BEFORE: TEMPLEMAN J . REPRESENTATION. ... Campbell v The Australian Mutual Provident Society (1908) 77 LJPC 117, PC. Dominion Cotton Mills Co Ltd v Amyot [1912] AC 546, … WebDaniels v Campbell NO and Others. 2004 (5) SA 331 (CC); 2004 (7) BCLR 735 (CC) at para 43; Hyundaiabove n 116 at para 26. eufy g32 pro review

Renunciation of benefits from a will: Who is a ‘spouse’?

WebSee Page 1. 3) In Daniels v Campbell NO and others, the Constitutional Court found that the word “spouse” in certain legislation should include partners in monogamous Muslim marriages. 4) In Hassam v Jacobs NO and others, the Constitutional Court found that spouses in polygynous Muslim marriages should be afforded the same benefits as those ... WebROBIN GRIEVE CAMPBELL NO First Respondent MELISSA FOURIE NO Second Respondent SORAYA DANIELS Third Respondent ... 7 Daniels v C ampbell NO and … WebDaniels v Campbell NO and Others,[1] an important case in South African law, was heard in the Constitutional Court[2] on 6 November 2003, with judgment handed down on 11 … firing fireworks